Question:
why do bose speakers suck?
2011-12-05 12:27:59 UTC
Ok, I've heard lots of criticism of bose speakers. They're cheap, they're overpriced, etc. Thing is, I'm a bose guy. Have been all my life. If it's true that they really do suck for the money, then I don't want to be anymore, but I have to be actually convinced with helpful data that I can go confirm by myself. What should I listen for (both in faulty bose products and in good, other products)? How do I get into REAL hi-fi? What would cost as much and perform better than, say, a bose home theater system? What would perform as good and cost much less? Please help me
Eleven answers:
Kevin L
2011-12-05 18:31:43 UTC
Bose has never built a good quality speaker, even there first speakers needed a equalizer in order to achieve a "flatter" frequency responce, and even then sounded terrible.



They are the only speaker manufacture that spends allot of money on marketing and advertizing, but the quality of there product is very low quality. The enclosure, drivers are literally some of the cheapest parts used.



There are so many better speakers on the market if you search them out. If you look in the high independent high end stores, and better magazines you wont see a bose speaker anywhere in site.



The better magazines are Absolute Sound & Stereophile,



Better high quality speaker systems do not use subwoofers to try and supplement the lack in low bass information. They are marketing a speaker to consumers to make them believe they don't have to have a big speaker in order to get a big sound. Well lol that is not reality if your trying to get a big sound. Good bass requires a reasonable size speaker enclosure and bass is also stereo not mono with a one woofer speaker system like bose.



Example of some of the better manufactures who offer truly high end sound on a budget are Vandersteen & Magnepan. And its endless what you can spend, and it only gets better.



Not only is Bose not the best, it is really a very low end speaker system in the real world of audio. Its great marketing from a speaker manufacture that builds some of the cheapest speakers in the industry.



Kevin

40 years high end audio video specialist
Grumpy Mac
2011-12-05 18:24:40 UTC
"but I have to be actually convinced with helpful data that I can go confirm by myself"



Try to contact Bose for real frequency response data on their cube speakers. They will not give out this information which is a huge criticism of their products.



Do an internet search for "Bose vs Consumer Reports". Because of this lawsuit - Bose suing anybody who posts a review - nobody can review Bose speakers without threat of legal action. If a company actually produced a good product - they could probably handle a real review or comparison with other gear. But not Bose.



Pick a Bose speaker system. Call around for prices. You will find that every store that carries Bose has to sell them for a fixed price. Bose makes the stores sign this agreement to create the impression they are a premium brand. It's Marketing BS, but it works.



Do you have elderly friends? Ask them for a copy of AARP magazine. Every issue of this elderly persons magazine has at least 1 ad for Bose. Bose targets the elderly for their wave radio and their simple-to-operate 1.2.3 home theater system. The elderly - are not known for good hearing.



WHAT WOULD PERFORM BETTER



If you like the small speaker sizes - check out Anthony Gallow softball sized speakers (www.roundsound.com). Unlike Bose - these speakers have appeared in Stereophile's Editors Choice list. Combine them with a good sub and you have a superior system.



For more traditional speaker - check out Paradigm. I have sent friends to stores just to audition, and they come back having bought the system because they sounded so good.



Energy, Definitive, B&W, etc., are all well respected brands for music and home theater.



If you really wanted a great music system - check out a pair of Magnipan MMG-1's ($650/pair) and a good subwoofer (SVS or HSU Research or Velodyne). These would create a fantastic music system with much greater detail and accuracy than most other speakers, let alone Bose.



Hope this helps.
ANDRE L
2011-12-05 13:52:10 UTC
-First I just need to clarify something so we’re all on the same page here. Bose speaker systems are entry-level… if you think they’re audiophile-quality or anything even close to it then you are severely misinformed. So why all the hype? Well the reason I think is simple: they have an aggressive marketing plan. Just think about it - how many TV commercials or popular magazine ads have you seen for Bose?-



It's easy to find such data on the 'Net; Just Google -Bose sucks-.



As to what's better and less costly, pretty much any specialist speaker maker, such as Infinity, JBL, Polk and so on make speakers that sound better than Bose and for less money.



And, avoid all home theater in a box systems. They pretty much all suck. Just get a good model home theater receiver, such as from Pioneer, Harman Kardon, Denon or Yamaha, and match up a set of speakers from the already listed makers, and you'll have good sound for a good price.
AVDADDY
2011-12-05 13:10:50 UTC
For the record, the older Bose standalone speakers such as the 701's & others in that series were great speakers. Professional Bose speakers are great. What sucks are the over priced HTIB's that don't allow you to upgrade or add components (BOSE is not the only culprit here). Buy ANY entry level AV receiver, & pair it with a Klipsch Synergy Quintet III Home Theater Speaker System (for example), add a Klipsch sub-woofer, and you'll hear the difference immediately. If you're serious, take your question & your favorite listening material to a reputable audio dealer.
Throwaway1192
2011-12-06 12:34:24 UTC
@ Fydollaho



Are you a troll? Or just a moron? Bose "Wave tech" will never be "cracked" because nobody cares to crack it. Bose's wave technology just makes music sound distant and muddy. It's really just a bunch of plastic tubes in front of the paper speakers... lol. I could build that out of plumbing supplies. (And it would probably sound as good, or better)



Anyways. I'm happy with my AudioEngine A2s. They're made in America by hand, and they have silk dome tweeters and woven kevlar drivers. All for a whopping $200. Bose could never deliver that kind of quality... even for many times more $$!! I'm happy with my decision to go with a legitimate audio brand rather than BestBuy's puppet master, Bose.





Ohh Bose fanboys, they never will understand...
?
2015-08-10 13:23:02 UTC
This Site Might Help You.



RE:

why do bose speakers suck?

Ok, I've heard lots of criticism of bose speakers. They're cheap, they're overpriced, etc. Thing is, I'm a bose guy. Have been all my life. If it's true that they really do suck for the money, then I don't want to be anymore, but I have to be actually convinced with...
mark_hensley@sbcglobal.net
2011-12-05 19:22:10 UTC
X,



You sound like an addict. lol. Really I am just kidding, I managed to get a chuckle out of the sincerity of your question with the thought of the many answers your in store for. I have long defended my appreciation for Bose. My contention is that Bose is just fine for what I want it for. Someone who spends $4,0000 on stereo equipment is a different animal than a person who fits the Bose profile. Take for instance the Bose Flat screen tv for $4000 plus. It is by far the best sounding all in one flatscreen on the market bar none. Bose took the time to associate sound and video putting together a muscular audio video product. Mind you, the person who fits the Bose profile would pay $4000 for said flat screen likes simple. The person who is an audiophile would only use the Bose flat screen as a tombstone over their dead body. To the person who fits the Bose profile just turn it on and it works. No moving parts or very little and it looks fine and sounds great. Simple is the operative word. The same could be said for the wave guide systems. Just turn it on and it works, noting to tweak, tune or figure out, just plug and play. The Bose Companion 20 speakers, plug them into the usb port of your laptop and they sound really great as a near field set of speakers. The Bose Companion 3 an 5 same thing. Can you see the pattern?



For many consumers they can't figure out how it all comes together. They have experiences of getting something like a flat screen or receiver, you have remote for this, a button for that, aspect ratios, surround sound format all these inputs on the back of the receiver and flat screen and so forth. Conversely, Bose niche in the market is simple. Secondly, as long as it works and sounds good, the record speaks for itself, people will buy Bose. They don't care what its made out of as long as it works, flawlessly. For the most part Bose is so simple very few things snap or break. They tend to last a long, long, long time. Which leads me to my next point, value. Because the Bose "thing" sits there nobly minding its own business, reliably working, turning on and off, the buying public associates it with Apple products, too. Apple allows Bose to advertise the iphone right next to Bose product. This is brand association.



Bose doesn't suck people just hate that Bose can get over. The same has been argued about Harley Davidson, you listen for five minutes to people who ride a bike and they will tell you Harley is junk. Harley Davidson has this trademark sound, but really its a rattle trap. PC lovers who hate Apple will tell you exactly the same thing as Bose haters. Overpriced, you can do so much better with a netbook over an ipad for the money. No different here. Is Bose the best? It is when it comes to simple. Does Bose suck? Not everything Bose makes is defensible, neither is Altec Lansing and Phillips or Sony for that matter. I would say that Bose can be complimentary to other brands if you have the good Bose stuff, namely the wave guide products for the most part. I am speaking of the Bose Sounddock 10, The large Bose Wave System, the Bose Wave Radio with an amp can be an outstanding set up, this is where Bose excels. I recently listened to a B&W Zepplin and it sounded muffled. I looked at the settings. I wouldn't buy the Zepplin today. A year or two ago I heard the Zepplin and it was surreal. It all depends on what you listen to, where and from what source. I like Bose and see no reason to change course.



Best.
2016-03-29 03:13:34 UTC
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/z2mvi



bose do suck they are over priced over rated JUNK,, there is better speakers available which give a better sound to bose for the same price kef mordaunt short monitor audio neat motive totem rainmaker dali accoustic energy all those speakers are better than bose and the people who say bose is the best have probably not let there ear holes listen to music through those speakers IF they did they would tell you bose is crap compared to them
2014-07-15 14:31:52 UTC
My biggest complaint about Bose is they tend to exclude dedicated tweeters from many of their products and as such, I think they sound confined and very directional. Now that being said I own a "2.1" computer speaker set from Bose and overall I'm pretty satisfied with it while I'm sitting at a desk. Would I replace my hi-fi setup I do "serious" music listening to with anything from Bose? Ha, no......
2015-08-07 17:19:49 UTC
I own some 901's. They sound terrible.
Slappy McStretchNuts
2011-12-05 13:31:17 UTC
I don't think they suck. I just think that you can equal their sound for considerably less money, or exceed it greatly for the same money, going head-to-head.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...