The panasonic plasma's are NOT quite as good as the old Elite units, but darn good.
I always recommend Panasonic Plasma televisions for video gamers because all the units include a "gamer mode" to reduce gamer lag and plasma has the 600 hz refresh to minimize motion blur.
The guys at TechZilla who calibrate and love outstanding video quality - have plasmas for their home systems.
HOWEVER: For the last several years, the higher end Samsung, LG and even the 1 left Sony XBR television have been at the top of the recommended lists from magazines like Home Theater, Consumer Reports and Sound and Vision. These are LCD/LED with 120 or 240 hz refresh for the 3D models.
If the higher end Plasma models are superior for the picture, why are the slightly less superior LCD/LED models better rated and recommended?
I have pondered this question and come up with a theory:
"The superior image is only an advantage with high-quality sources like a blockbuster BluRay".
A LOT of people watch broadcast TV or do streaming or torrents. Streaming is frankly .. highly compressed. The slightly better display of plasma is swamped by the lower-quality of the streaming video.
I suspect 95% of what you watch would not be any better on a Plasma vs the higher end LCD/LED panels.
Go read the reviews. Go to YouTube and search for "TekHD" channel. They do TV reviews and I tend to like what they feel is important.
Good Luck.